Getting to plan B, by John Mullins and Randy Komisar, is an important book. In short, the thesis of the book is that successful startups very often had to change their initial business plan. To quote Mullins and Komisar: "If the founders of Google, Paypal or Starbucks had stuck to their original business plans, we'd likely never had heard of them." The startup process, largely driven by poorly conceived business plans based on untested assumptions, is seriously flawed. And the authors to give a few interesting examples of business plans changes that were successful. If only for this, the book is important because, despite many criticisms, business planning remains the cornerstone of entrepreneurship courses at business school, and well honed business plans are a must-have to pitch venture capital. The fact that no business plan survives the first encounter with reality seems to bother no one in industry. Importantly, the flaw does not lie in some limitations of the planners. In other words, it is not because of poor planners that business plans are useless, or even harmful. It is the very process of planning that is problematic. Behind the notion of planning lie the idea that to control the future, we need to predict it. However, recent research on entrepreneurship by Sarasvathy (see the concept of effectuation) showed that in uncertain environments, it is simply not possible to predict the future. Hence prediction is really a gamble.
🇫🇷 Lisez-moi en français
Books
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 8,821 other subscribersSearch my blog
Key words
affordable loss apple Artificial intelligence book review Business model business plan clayton christensen conference conflict of commitment Control Coronavirus Corporate transformation Covid-19 creativity Crisis management decision making Descartes digital economy digital transformation digitization disruption disruptive innovation Disruptive technology effectuation entrepreneurial process entrepreneurship Eric Ries fail fast fast second Forbes framing frank knight GE geroski Gillette government Immunity to change incremental innovation innovation Innovation book Innovation management innovator innovator's dilemma Jean-Paul Gaillard Jeffrey Immelt Jim collins Kodak leadership Lean Startup Management Management of uncertainty markides mental model microsoft nespresso Nestlé organizational decline Performance prediction Public expert public sector radical innovation risk risk control Risk management Sarah Kaplan Saras Sarasvathy sense making sony Strategic surprise strategy The balancing act of innovation transformation uncertainty user experienceFollow me on Twitter
- Mythe: "Les enfants ne lisent plus à cause de TikTok" Réalité: BookTok fait plus de un milliard de vues. Désormais… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 7 hours ago
- Sur ma liste de lecture. twitter.com/alexiskarklins… 17 hours ago
- RT @OlivierBabeau: La richesse créée par les entrepreneurs n’est pas prise aux gens. Elle enrichit la société tout entière. Contrairement a… 1 day ago
- RT @OlivierBabeau: Il faut le répéter, en dépit des envolées des tribuns démagos : non, l’économie n’est pas un jeu à somme nulle. https://… 1 day ago
- La planification est la solution à tous nos problèmes. What could go wrong? twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron… 1 day ago