It’s becoming common to use Kodak as a showcase for failing to innovate: the company is described as having missed the digital revolution because it was focused on protecting its core business, traditional photographic film. The reality is different, though. Kodak is in fact one of the first companies to have worked on digital imaging. In 1992, for one of my clients’ projects, we bought a digital camera. It was a Kodak, the DCS 200, and it costed about $200K. Yes, that’s two hundred thousand US dollars. One can not say Kodak was ignoring the digital revolution! Today, Kodak is still leading digital imaging, as the company holds many patents in this field that are used in products such as HP printers. The painful Kodak factory closures that one can see nowdays are nothing but the price to pay to transition from one era to the other, from the era when Kodak was a chemist to an era when it is a software company. For all its mistakes, Kodak is doing what few companies have been able to do.
No doubt, Kodak was victim of the innovator’s dilemma as described by Christensen: the company tried to "cram" digital photography into traditional photography with the pathetic APS system. But that didn’t stop the them from pressing ahead and ending up, today, in the leading group of digital camera manufacturers. Not bad for a chemist! The initial dilemma, however, probably costed them their leadership, maybe forever, as forecasted by Christensen’s theory.
🇫🇷 Lisez-moi en français
Join 8,240 other followers
Search my blog
Key wordsapple Artificial intelligence book review burgelman Business model business plan clayton christensen conference conflict of commitment Control Coronavirus Corporate transformation Covid-19 creativity Crisis management cross-boundary disrupters decision making digital economy digital transformation digitization disruption disruptive innovation Disruptive technology effectuation entrepreneurship fail fast fast second Forbes framing frank knight geroski Gillette incremental innovation innovation Innovation book Innovation management innovator innovator's dilemma iphone ipod Jean-Paul Gaillard Jeffrey Immelt Jim collins John mullins Kodak leadership Lean Startup Management Management of uncertainty markides mental model microsoft nespresso Nestlé organizational decline Performance prediction radical innovation reducing costs risk risk control Risk management Sarah Kaplan Saras Sarasvathy schumpeter sense making sony Strategic surprise strategy The balancing act of innovation the economist transformation uncertainty vlerick wal-mart
- RT @LegendumEst: J’aime les conseils de @phsilberzahn. Lire son papier ⤵️. Ne sous-estimons pas la puissance de nuisance (flou, perte d’éne… 6 hours ago
- RT @JL7508: "Quand vous comparez le taux de croissance de la France ces 20 dernières années aux Etats-Unis et à la Suisse, on est en train… 10 hours ago
- Predictions are everywhere. In a world of uncertainty and surprises, should you believe them? philippesilberzahneng.com/2022/09/29/cha… 11 hours ago
- RT @oliviagregoire: Par démagogie, parfois par méconnaissance, beaucoup stigmatisent et défigurent la réalité des entrepreneurs en France.… 12 hours ago
- RT @GeWoessner: Industrie, agriculture... L’échec cuisant des politiques d’"excellence Française", ou comment mettre en oeuvre la décroissa… 13 hours ago