There was a very interesting conference by Phil Agre on October 4th (yes that was some time ago) in Paris. I couldn’t attend, but was told about the content and I think the conference is worth mentioning. Agre promotes an entrepreneurial vision of personal development in society that I find very interesting.
Social and political theories tend to describe society as a static structure. In reality, each human being creates his/her own career through entrepreneurial processes: by creating relational networks and structures around emerging topics of interest. This creation is not limited to business, but is concerns all careers, be they professional, civic, artistic and scientific. Successful entrepreneurial paths require a particular type of cognition. According to Agre, the inegal distribution of this specific cognitive capacity lies at the source of many social problems.
This view is interesting in that it is a generalization of the concept of entrepreneurship way beyond the business area. In sum, we’re all the entrepreneurs of our life, and this ability matters more than institutions we might work with. Sartre would have said that in this view, existence precedes essence, and that we’re actually very much in control of the existence.
I exchanged emails with Phil, but he told me he hasn’t put his thougths about the topic into a paper yet. You can still visit his home page: http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre
🇫🇷 Lisez-moi en français
Subscribe to Blog via EmailJoin 8,821 other subscribers
Search my blog
Key wordsaffordable loss apple Artificial intelligence book review Business model business plan clayton christensen conference conflict of commitment Control Coronavirus Corporate transformation Covid-19 creativity Crisis management decision making Descartes digital economy digital transformation digitization disruption disruptive innovation Disruptive technology effectuation entrepreneurial process entrepreneurship Eric Ries fail fast fast second Forbes framing frank knight GE geroski Gillette government Immunity to change incremental innovation innovation Innovation book Innovation management innovator innovator's dilemma Jean-Paul Gaillard Jeffrey Immelt Jim collins Kodak leadership Lean Startup Management Management of uncertainty markides mental model microsoft nespresso Nestlé organizational decline Performance prediction Public expert public sector radical innovation risk risk control Risk management Sarah Kaplan Saras Sarasvathy sense making sony Strategic surprise strategy The balancing act of innovation transformation uncertainty user experience
- Mythe: "Les enfants ne lisent plus à cause de TikTok" Réalité: BookTok fait plus de un milliard de vues. Désormais… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 8 hours ago
- Sur ma liste de lecture. twitter.com/alexiskarklins… 17 hours ago
- RT @OlivierBabeau: La richesse créée par les entrepreneurs n’est pas prise aux gens. Elle enrichit la société tout entière. Contrairement a… 1 day ago
- RT @OlivierBabeau: Il faut le répéter, en dépit des envolées des tribuns démagos : non, l’économie n’est pas un jeu à somme nulle. https://… 1 day ago
- La planification est la solution à tous nos problèmes. What could go wrong? twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron… 1 day ago