In a previous post, I explained why I think that Firefox does not stand a chance against Microsoft Explorer. I won’t comment on some hysterical reactions to this post of some open source extremists who accused me of all things – their excess and insults only undermine the "cause" they serve. Despite this, an interesting discussion was launched and I take comfort to see that some Web sites also question Firefox’s potential ability to dislodge Explorer. To sum up, my reasoning is that Firefox, despite its qualities, is not a radical improvement over Explorer. MIcrosoft hasn’t improved Explorer for years, secure in its monopoly after the Netscape battle. But as a result of the new pressure created by Firefox, it will only take a big effort from Microsoft – something they’re expert at – to catch up and introduce a new release that offers security, stability and ease of use. As a result, Firefox’s advantage will be reduced if not suppressed. Devoted open source militant will not switch back to Explorer for sure, but how many are they? Based on this I ventured to conclude that Firefox would not succeed against Explorer, except in some niches. Having said that, Microsoft faces an interesting dilemma with Explorer, and the future of Firefox might well depend on how the Redmond firm will solve it…
🇫🇷 Lisez-moi en français
Books
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 8,821 other subscribersSearch my blog
Key words
affordable loss apple Artificial intelligence book review Business model business plan clayton christensen conference conflict of commitment Control Coronavirus Corporate transformation Covid-19 creativity Crisis management decision making Descartes digital economy digital transformation digitization disruption disruptive innovation Disruptive technology effectuation entrepreneurial process entrepreneurship Eric Ries fail fast fast second Forbes framing frank knight GE geroski Gillette government Immunity to change incremental innovation innovation Innovation book Innovation management innovator innovator's dilemma Jean-Paul Gaillard Jeffrey Immelt Jim collins Kodak leadership Lean Startup Management Management of uncertainty markides mental model microsoft nespresso Nestlé organizational decline Performance prediction Public expert public sector radical innovation risk risk control Risk management Sarah Kaplan Saras Sarasvathy sense making sony Strategic surprise strategy The balancing act of innovation transformation uncertainty user experienceFollow me on Twitter
- Sur ma liste de lecture. twitter.com/alexiskarklins… 4 hours ago
- RT @OlivierBabeau: La richesse créée par les entrepreneurs n’est pas prise aux gens. Elle enrichit la société tout entière. Contrairement a… 16 hours ago
- RT @OlivierBabeau: Il faut le répéter, en dépit des envolées des tribuns démagos : non, l’économie n’est pas un jeu à somme nulle. https://… 17 hours ago
- La planification est la solution à tous nos problèmes. What could go wrong? twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron… 21 hours ago
- "Les intellectuels sont naturellement attirés par l'idée d'une société planifiée, car ils croient qu'ils seront en… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 22 hours ago