Disruptive innovation, entrepreneurship and organizational transformation
Disruptive innovation, entrepreneurship and organizational transformation
Disruptive innovation, entrepreneurship and organizational transformation
Think a disruptive innovation succeeds because it outperforms current solutions?
Think again: It often underperforms on existing criteria. The key to its success is that it introduces new criteria where it makes a difference.
(more…)The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence is sparking widespread fears, and not just among the general public—some of the very innovators driving AI forward are sounding the alarms too, in particular regarding employment. Mustafa Suleyman, a leading figure in AI, recently declared, “AI is fundamentally a tool to replace human labor.” Is this cause for concern? Not necessarily.
(more…)There’s a well-established theory in strategy called first-mover advantage. It states that the first company to enter a new market is able to erect a barrier to entry that secures a position that is difficult for subsequent entrants to challenge. While this theory may seem obvious, it is often contradicted by the facts. A good example is video conferencing.
(more…)How can organizations master disruptive innovation three decades after Clayton Christensen first illuminated the concept? The real challenge goes beyond merely identifying disruptions—it involves scaling them effectively. To do so, organizations must uncover and understand the common pitfalls that hinder widespread impact.
(more…)The world is changing profoundly, rapidly, and in every dimension. But where is this change coming from? What’s causing it? For many, the answer is simple: the world is changing because of political action. Great leaders take a problem and act to solve it. But when we look at history and the evolution of the world, another reality emerges: social change is rooted in everyday life. Change that is not wanted and organized by politicians, but often only sanctioned – or slowed down – by them.
(more…)In the complex landscape of organizational dynamics, the tension between creativity and structure often emerges as a profound paradox. On the one hand, processes are essential for managing complexity and growth within an organization. On the other hand, the very development of processes can sometimes stifle the creative flow that fuels an organization’s ability to adapt to its environment. How do we resolve this paradox? The key lies in having the right understanding of what a process is.
(more…)The significance of great inventions has often been completely overlooked by observers of the time. The historic flight of the Wright brothers on December 17, 1903, exactly 120 years ago, is a case in point.
(more…)The reasons companies miss big disruptions are always the same, and they’re at work with AI. Here are seven of them. Don’t repeat the mistake and miss the AI boat.
(more…)The world of management is awash in buzzwords, fashionable phrases, and hollow concepts. This is a problem because misnaming a phenomenon prevents us from understanding it properly and therefore from managing it. A good example is the term “disruptive technology,” which is very misleading.
(more…)There are some very important thinkers who have been forgotten, and we would do well to rediscover them. Such is the case with Mary Parker Follett. She was a pioneer of management in the broadest sense in the 1920s. Many of her innovative ideas were taken up and developed by people who went on to become very famous, such as Peter Drucker, who acknowledged that he owed a great deal to her. In particular, she wrote some very important things about the relationship between conflict and creativity that should be of interest not only to entrepreneurs and innovators, but also to business leaders and, let’s face it, politicians.
(more…)